The Supreme Court on Friday took a stern view of a Bar Council of India (BCI) circular directing all state bar councils not to enrol any 2026 batch graduate of NALSAR University of Law as advocates, saying students have a right to protest.
Supreme Court questions BCI intervention
A bench headed by Chief Justice Surya Kant said the BCI has nothing to do in the matter as it was a dialogue between him and the students.
"They (students) have a right to protest. Who can stop them," the CJI, who was heading a bench which also comprised Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana, said.
"It's a dialogue between me and students. Who are they (BCI) to interfere," the CJI said.
The observations came after a plea challenging the BCI circular was mentioned for urgent listing.
No punitive action against NALSAR students
The bench issued notice to the BCI seeking its response on the plea and directed that no punitive action be taken against the students or faculty of the NALSAR at the instance of the BCI or any other state bar councils.
The counsel appearing for the BCI told the bench that the circular has been withdrawn.
The bench posted the matter for hearing after two weeks.
BCI had initially barred 2026 graduates
On August 13, the BCI directed all state bar councils not to enrol any 2026 graduate of NALSAR University of Law as advocates until further orders, but reversed this order within hours after an uproar on social media.
In the first statement, BCI chairperson Manan Kumar Mishra said it was examining allegations regarding a campaign against CJI Kant's participation in the university's convocation and had sought a report identifying those responsible.
The apex statutory body for lawyers said a final decision in the matter would be taken on August 19 after considering the material placed before it.
BCI later allows enrolment
The BCI then modified its decision after the uproar on social media and allowed state bar councils to enrol 2026 graduates of NALSAR University of Law as advocates.
The new notification modified the earlier order, saying the "vast majority" of the students were innocent and should not be made to suffer for the alleged misconduct of a few.