International students have emerged as a prominent focus of the administration's immigration enforcement policies 
Exclusive

US plans largest mass visa revocation ever; up to 2,00,000 foreigners to face revocation

The Trump administration expands immigration crackdown through continuous vetting, with foreign students and temporary visa holders facing scrutiny over criminal, security and immigration violations

The United States is preparing for what officials say could become the largest mass visa revocation exercise in the country's history, with as many as 200,000 foreign nationals potentially losing permission to enter or remain in the country as the Trump administration intensifies scrutiny of visa holders. The State Department has already revoked more than 175,000 visas since President Donald Trump returned to office in January 2025, according to figures released earlier this month. The number is expected to climb further as authorities expand continuous vetting of millions of foreign nationals holding US visas.

The crackdown covers a wide range of temporary visas and is part of the administration's broader effort to tighten legal as well as illegal immigration. Officials have indicated that visa holders can remain under scrutiny even after successfully completing the application and security-screening process. Foreign students are among the groups facing heightened scrutiny, along with visitors and temporary workers.

Continuous vetting replaces one-time checks

A central feature of the administration's approach is the use of continuous vetting rather than treating the issuance of a visa as the end of the screening process. US authorities are examining government databases, law-enforcement information and other records for indications that a visa holder may no longer qualify for the document.

Criminal offences, overstaying permitted periods of admission, security concerns and other violations of visa conditions can potentially result in revocation. The administration has also expanded scrutiny of social media activity in parts of the immigration system, arguing that online information can reveal security concerns or other grounds that were not apparent when an applicant was initially screened.

Officials maintain that holding a US visa is a privilege rather than a right and that the government retains authority to cancel visas when individuals are found to be ineligible. The policy represents a significant shift in the scale of post-issuance scrutiny. Instead of concentrating primarily on applicants before visas are granted, authorities are increasingly reviewing people who already possess valid documents.

Students among those affected

International students have emerged as a prominent focus of the administration's immigration enforcement policies. Thousands of student visas have already been revoked since Trump returned to office, with authorities citing reasons ranging from criminal offences and immigration violations to security-related concerns. The developments have created uncertainty for universities that depend heavily on international enrolment, particularly institutions with large numbers of students from India, China and other Asian countries.

A visa revocation can have serious consequences, although the precise impact depends on the individual's circumstances and whether the person is inside or outside the United States. A visa primarily allows a foreign national to seek entry at a US port of entry; it is distinct from the immigration status governing someone's lawful stay after admission. As a result, cancellation of a visa does not automatically have identical consequences in every case.

Nevertheless, affected individuals may face difficulties travelling internationally, returning to the US or maintaining their immigration position depending on the basis and circumstances of the action.

175,000 visas already revoked

The State Department said earlier in August that more than 175,000 visas had been revoked since the beginning of Trump's second term, already representing an extraordinary increase in enforcement. Authorities have cited offences including driving under the influence, assault and theft among the reasons for cancellations, alongside security and immigration-related grounds. The administration argues that the enhanced screening protects Americans and ensures foreign visitors comply with the conditions under which they were admitted.

Critics, however, have raised concerns about transparency and due process, particularly when visas are cancelled without affected individuals receiving detailed explanations or an opportunity to challenge the underlying allegations before action is taken. Immigration advocates have also warned that increasingly aggressive enforcement could discourage international students, skilled professionals and tourists from choosing the United States.

Broader immigration restrictions expand

The visa revocation campaign is unfolding alongside a much wider tightening of US immigration policy. The administration has restricted visa processing for nationals of several countries, increased scrutiny of employment-based immigration and pursued major changes affecting foreign workers and students. Some of those policies have faced setbacks in federal courts. A judge recently struck down a Trump administration policy that had suspended immigrant visa processing for nationals of 75 countries, ruling that the blanket restriction exceeded the government's statutory authority.

At the same time, the administration is pursuing substantially higher costs for parts of the legal immigration system, including a proposal to formalise a fee exceeding $100,000 for certain new H-1B petitions. The combination of tougher screening, higher fees and large-scale visa cancellations signals a broader transformation of American immigration enforcement extending well beyond the country's southern border.

If revocations reach the projected 200,000 mark, the campaign would establish a new benchmark for the scale at which Washington has withdrawn visas from foreign nationals — and reinforce the administration's message that immigration scrutiny does not end once permission to travel to the United States has been granted.